wins with Mastercard in the EU Court in 12 trademark matters

May 29, 2020 1:49 PM|

The Court of the European Union in Luxembourg agreed with in 12 proceedings initiated by Mastercard International, Inc. before the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). wins with Mastercard

In 2016, Mastercard filed 12 oppositions against trademarks comprising elements of two overlapping circles claiming that they fall within the monopoly of Mastercard trademarks.

The EUIPO at first instance agreed with and dismissed the oppositions on the grounds that the trademarks are not similar, but the Board of Appeals of EUIPO overruled these decisions. According to the Board, cases should have been suspended due to other parallel pending proceedings which outcome would be prejudicial for the oppositions filed by Mastercard.

Despite this conclusion, the Board did not suspend the proceedings but sent them back to the I instance together with guidelines which were unfavourable for, as to how cases should be resolved. did not agree with this verdict. The Polish company submitted 12 complaints to the EU Court indicating inter alia that the Board of Appeal should have suspended the proceedings in each case when the suspension was justified. The complaints also alleged that the Board should not have ruled on appeals and should not at this stage make any guidelines to the first instance on how to settle the matter. The EU court in the judgment announced on Thursday (28th May) in the joined 12 cases fully shared the above argumentation of

Dr hab. Ewa Skrzydło-Tefelska and advocate Karol Gajek, lawyers from the Sołtysiński Kawecki and Szlęzak law firm, who represented before the EU Court in all 12 cases emphasize that this judgment, although it did not resolve the crucial issue of trademark similarity at this stage, prevent the Board of Appeal from the issuance of guidelines unfavourable to on how to settle the case by the first instance, before the case was fully examined. The judgment constitutes a precedent concerning the practice of EUIPO in the matter of suspending the proceedings due to other prejudicial parallel proceedings affecting its result. At the same time, the lawyers emphasize that the judgment is not final.

May 29, 2020 1:49 PM|

See also:

May 28, 2020 9:00 AM among the most successful Polish brands according to "List 500"

May 26, 2020 1:31 PM — one of the top Polish companies according to the Wprost weekly magazine

May 22, 2020 9:00 AM

Apple Pay at

May 21, 2020 8:58 AM

Serbian Dinar — New Currency Available at

May 18, 2020 3:29 PM

Conotoxia with a revolutionary offer for clients trading on Indices

Apr 7, 2020 9:55 AM triumphs again in the prestigious Bloomberg’s ranking

Attractive exchange rates of 27 currencies